Is it misophonia? Tests and help
An honest look at the current assessment instruments, what they can and cannot tell you, and where to look for professional support in each of the five markets this Hub serves.
There is no single test
The first thing to say clearly: there is no single validated diagnostic test for misophonia that any one professional can administer and issue a definitive result from.
This is not because the condition is doubtful. It is because — as covered in the definition article — misophonia is not yet listed in DSM-5-TR or ICD-11, and formal diagnostic classification typically lags behind clinical recognition by many years. Assessment is currently research- and clinician-led rather than checklist-based.
What does exist is a set of increasingly well-validated assessment instruments used in research and specialist clinical practice.
The main assessment instruments
Amsterdam Misophonia Scale (A-MISO-S)
Developed by the Amsterdam group led by Damiaan Denys, the A-MISO-S was one of the first structured misophonia assessment tools. It measures symptom severity across six dimensions and produces a total score used to classify severity as subclinical, mild, moderate, severe, or extreme. Widely used in research; not typically self-administered.1
Duke Misophonia Questionnaire (DMQ)
A more recent instrument developed by the Duke Center for Misophonia and Emotion Regulation, the DMQ is designed to assess both trigger sensitivity and functional impact across multiple sub-scales. It has been validated in larger and more diverse samples than the A-MISO-S. Emerging as the current best-supported comprehensive assessment tool.2
MisoQuest
A shorter screening instrument developed by Siepsiak and colleagues at the University of Warsaw. Faster to administer than the A-MISO-S or DMQ; useful as an initial screen.3
Selective Sound Sensitivity Syndrome Scale (S-Five)
A validated scale developed by Vitoratou and colleagues at King’s College London, assessing five dimensions of misophonia including emotional threat, internalising and externalising appraisals, and impact.4
On self-assessment
Online “misophonia tests” are common, and some are better than others. In general, they can be a useful first indicator of whether your experience is consistent with misophonia. They should not be treated as diagnoses.
If a self-completed instrument returns a result suggesting significant misophonia symptoms, the appropriate next step is a conversation with an appropriately qualified professional, not a private conclusion.
Reasons to be careful about relying on self-assessment alone:
- None of the online instruments are validated for standalone diagnostic use.
- Several conditions produce overlapping presentations (see misophonia vs hyperacusis vs phonophobia).
- Co-occurring conditions — anxiety, OCD, autism spectrum conditions, PTSD — may substantially change the picture and the appropriate response.
Where to seek professional assessment
In every one of the five markets this Hub serves, the appropriate starting point is a primary-care clinician — a GP, family doctor, or nurse practitioner — who can identify the appropriate onward referral for your specific situation.
United Kingdom
Start with your GP. Onward routes may include: audiology (particularly for co-occurring hyperacusis), CAMHS (for children and adolescents), or adult mental-health services. Private routes include specialist psychologists and hypnotherapists with misophonia experience; verify credentials with the appropriate registering body.
United States
Start with your primary-care physician. Specialist misophonia clinics include the Duke Center for Misophonia and Emotion Regulation at Duke University and the sound-sensitivity research programme at the University of Florida. Private psychology and audiology practices with misophonia experience are increasingly available.
Canada
Start with your family doctor. Provincial variation is significant. McMaster University has an active misophonia research programme. Private psychology and audiology practices vary in misophonia expertise; ask specifically about experience.
Australia
Start with your GP. A Medicare Mental Health Care Plan may enable access to some psychological services. The Australian Hearing Hub at Macquarie University has active research in this area. NDIS may be relevant for some students and adults with significant functional impairment.
New Zealand
Start with your GP. Onward routes include audiology and mental-health services. Access varies by region; the Ministry of Health website has current pathway information.
The MisoGo Online programme.
A self-paced educational programme based on the same framework used in specialist 1:1 sessions. Not a diagnostic tool — a structured approach to reducing impact.
This article does not diagnose
Nothing in this article — including the descriptions of assessment instruments — constitutes a diagnosis or a clinical recommendation. If misophonia is significantly affecting your life, a conversation with an appropriately qualified professional in your country is the right next step, not any online article.
Further reading
Related articles in the Misophonia Hub:
References
- Schröder A, Vulink N, Denys D. Misophonia: Diagnostic Criteria for a New Psychiatric Disorder. PLOS ONE, 2013.
- Rosenthal MZ, McMahon K, Greenleaf A, et al. The Duke Misophonia Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2021.
- Siepsiak M, Sobczak AM, Bohaterewicz B, et al. Development and Psychometric Properties of MisoQuest. 2020.
- Vitoratou S, et al. S-Five: Selective Sound Sensitivity Syndrome Scale. PLOS ONE, 2021.
